standing
Standing but for What?
March 24, 2009
According to the San Antonio court, a trial court
erred when it found that a man had no standing to
file a suit affecting the parent-child relationship
because the evidence on the man's relationship with
the children was contradictory. Only when the
evidence is undisputed may a court grant a plea to
the jurisdiction. The court remanded the case to be
heard by "the trier of fact." But unless the man paid
a jury fee, what would be the point? The case would
be heard by the same judge who found the mother's
testimony credible. Moreover, Troxel v.
Granville and its Texas progeny would prevent the
man from obtaining any possession of or access to the
children. In the Interest of Y.B., No.
04-08-00507-CV (Tex. App. - Austin Mar. 18, 2009).
Courtesy of Verner & Brumley, P.C. Dallas, Texas
Courtesy of Verner & Brumley, P.C. Dallas, Texas